Ebook Download Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide
Get the connect to download this Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide and start downloading. You could want the download soft data of guide Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide by undergoing various other activities. And that's all done. Now, your resort to read a book is not always taking and bring the book Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide anywhere you go. You could save the soft documents in your gadget that will never ever be far as well as read it as you such as. It is like checking out story tale from your gizmo after that. Now, begin to like reading Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide as well as get your brand-new life!
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide
Ebook Download Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide
Is Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide book your preferred reading? Is fictions? How's regarding record? Or is the best vendor novel your option to fulfil your downtime? Or perhaps the politic or religious books are you looking for currently? Here we go we provide Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide book collections that you require. Great deals of numbers of publications from numerous industries are offered. From fictions to scientific research and also spiritual can be browsed as well as learnt here. You might not fret not to locate your referred book to check out. This Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide is one of them.
When you require such publication, Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide, as the most effective publication appearance in this day can be an alternative. Currently, we could aid you to get this book as your own. It is really simple and also very easy. By visiting this web page, it ends up being the initial step to get the book. You should locate the connect to download and install and also most likely to the web link. It will not complicate as the various other site will do. In this instance, considering the page as the resource could make the factors of reading this publication strengthen.
You could make different point of exactly how analysis will give you better option. Yeah, Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide is a book produced by a professional author. You could take this sort of publication in this site. Why? We offer the billions kinds and also brochures of guides on the planet. So, in fact, it is not just this book. You could discover other publication types to be yours. The means is very basic, discover the link that we offer and also get the book sooner. Always attempt to be the initial individual to read this publication is very fun.
When someone needs to know something, this publication will most likely help to discover the solution. The reason why reading Tank Killers: A History Of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, By Harry Yeide is a need to is that it will certainly offers you a brand-new means or far better means. When somebody aims to make an effort to be success in certain point, it will assist you to understand how the thing will certainly be. Well, the simple means is that you may get included straight to act in your life after reading this publication as one of your life sources.
Review
“This gritty and well written account of the TD's is a fantastic read….Whether your interest is armour or history I would highly recommend this book.” (Military Modelling)"...very well-done... ought to be welcome by those of us who enjoy a good read ..." (Missing Lynx)"…interesting book, and definitely the best coverage of tank destroyers currently on the market." (Stone & Stone Second World War Books)"…this thoroughly researched and well presented history of a relatively little known, but significant, contributor to victory is a valuable addition to US Army history" (The Journal of America’s Military Past, Winter 2007)
Read more
About the Author
Harry Yeide has been a national security affairs analyst for the federal government for 27 years. He received a BA in political science and German from Muhlenberg College in 1982 and an MA in international affairs from the George Washington University in 1984. In his position with the federal government he has worked as a political, terrorism, and economic analyst on the Soviet Bloc, the Balkans, the Aegean, East Asia, South Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and he has served in numerous assignments overseas. He is the author of a number of works of military history, including The Longest Battle and First to the Rhine.
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 256 pages
Publisher: Casemate; Reprint edition (August 3, 2018)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1612006507
ISBN-13: 978-1612006505
Product Dimensions:
5 x 0.8 x 7.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 12.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.2 out of 5 stars
190 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#195,903 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
It's hard to imagine that the Armored Force of the USA was virtually non-existent at the same moment that Hitler started his Blitzkrieg attacks in Europe.There may have been a few tanks still around from WWI, but most of them were in military museums and displays. For all practical purposes, our Armored Force had long since been dead and buried.You could safely say that we were asleep at the switch.Other than obsolete WWI tanks, our total American tank inventory amounted to 240 machine-gun armed M1 and M2 light tanks, plus a single (1) medium tank prototype, armed with a 37mm gun.There were tentative budgetary plans to allocate $7 Mil for additional infantry tanks, but we had no tanks in large-scale production.What we did have was a force very similar to Poland's, in terms of size, and reliance on horse cavalry, with very little in the way of mechanized forces of any kind.Hitler routed Poland's army in about two weeks.To say that this was a wake-up call to the rest of the world, (and most especially to us) was a massive understatement.We weren't yet in the war, but it didn't take much imagination to realize that we had better start doing something soon.And so we started from scratch to invent and build a tank force, and we came up with the M4, which was competitive with, and even superior to, the early German tanks.It had a 75mm gun, compared to the 37mm and 50mm guns of the German panzers, at the start of the war.Thanks to Henry Ford, we had much experience with assembly-line auto production, and so we utilized this ability to produce tanks as well.And so, by the time D-Day arrived, we had had enough time to build almost 50,000 M4s, and sent ample numbers of them to England, to build up our invasion force.But Hitler was in love with tanks, and had a whole assortment of bigger, heavier tanks in the pipeline, which overwhelmed our lineup once they came on line.Also, we had to transport each and every tank - and not just tanks, but every piece of military equipment we used, across 3,000 miles of ocean, plus an additional trek from the ports to the battle site.Patton's technique was designed around rapid movement, and a battlefield strategy which did not necessarily involve brute force, or comparing one tank's relative features against another's.It worked - as he demonstrated repeatedly - and so what if Germany had bigger and better tanks than we did? Actually, the big bad Panthers and Tigers had many problems, which effectively kept them from being operational much of the time.What good is a formidable weapon if it doesn't work?But when they did work, they were devastating. We knew that Hitler's whole menacing force revolved around the tanks, and if we could stop the tanks, we could win the war. Not necessarily just with our tanks - which we already had, in plentiful numbers - but with whatever method we could devise to stop them.The M4 was a great tank, but was not built with enough armor, or enough firepower, to withstand the onslaught of the much heavier firepower of Hitler's Panther and Tiger tanks.Fortunately, early in the war, they didn't amount to a large percentage of the tanks we had to deal with. But as we began to run into more and more of them later on, they did start to present a problem.Thus was born the Tank Destroyers, or Tank Killers. Plus, artillery, bazookas, fighter-bombers, and any and everything we could devise to stop, and destroy, the German tanks.Whoever had the original idea to employ a self-standing gun, whether towed or self-propelled, specifically to blow up tanks, was a genius.Since the concept of the tank destroyers was so new, nobody seemed to know who they should be attached to. They were almost like the "red-headed step-child," in that nobody knew what to do with them.It seemed that everybody wanted them: The artillery wanted them to perform as additional firepower for them, the infantry wanted their support, and they supplemented the tanks - even bailing them out on many occasions with their superior gun strength.One thing that greatly contributed to the chaos, which could have easily been solved, was lack of communication. The radio frequencies were different for all three commands - infantry, armor, and artillery - and yet the tank killers were asked to integrate themselves with all three, without being able to communicate with them. It would seem that simply coming up with radios - for all three arms - which had variable frequencies, and could switch from one to the other, would have solved the problem.But once they were attached to an artillery command, for example, they were more or less "kidnapped," and taken over by the commander of whichever branch they were attached to, and spirited away from their own commanders.Even Patton didn't seem to be too sold on the TDs, but he should have been behind them 100%, because every panzer they knocked out was one less German tank he would have to worry about.When they were involved in firefights, they acquitted themselves beautifully by knocking out German tanks, which is what they were designed to do, right? He was probably a little bit jealous, since being built on an M4 chassis, they looked just like M4s, but had bigger, more powerful guns, and could knock out tanks that the M4 couldn't.The M10 had a 3", or high-velocity 76mm gun, and was very well-liked by the TD crews, since it was very potent and capable of knocking off almost anything it came up against, until the heavily-armored Tigers came along.Eventually, things improved considerably when they added the 90mm gun to the M10, making it an M36. This made it more than a match for the Tiger, but that came later in the war.But along with the higher gun power, also came the corresponding armor protection of the tank. The M4's armor was sufficient against the early German tanks, which had much less powerful guns, but did not protect the tank crew from the higher velocity guns, especially the 88, of the later Panthers and Tigers.Of course, the Tank Destroyers had no armor protection at all, for all practical purposes. They only had relatively thin-skinned shells, which protected them from some small-arms fire, but not against the tank's main gun.In fact, they didn't even have a roof overhead, to protect them from the weather, or from a grenade being thrown into the cockpit. Many of the TD crewmen resorted to constructing makeshift overhead canopies, or roofs, out of salvaged parts of other vehicles, for example.The tank vs tank mindset was not necessarily what proved to be successful, in the actual application of field forces.He didn't seem to worry too much about the M4 not matching up favorably to some of the German tanks - although most of the tanks we faced were pretty much on a par with what we had.The one that we had no answer for was the Tiger. It mounted the 88mm flak gun, which had no equal in destructive power, even at distances that our guns were completely ineffective at.But war is war, and whatever works, is what you count on to get the job done.One P-47 was worth many Tiger tanks, inasmuch as it could eliminate, from the air, virtually any tank, truck, train, gun emplacement, or troop formation it came up against.Probably the most fearsome opponent we faced was the devastating 88 ack-ack gun, which could be used as either an anti-aircraft or anti-tank weapon. This was what the Tigers had, which just simply devastated our M4s. They blew through our armor like it was cardboard.The only good news about the Tiger was that it was plagued by mechanical problems, which kept it off the battlefield much of the time. Plus, there were only about 100 of them operational, so it was rather unusual to encounter one. But when you did, they were a very big problem.Face to face, the M4 could not compete with the Tiger. It was simply no contest. Sometimes, though, if enough M4s were on the scene, and one could get behind the Tiger, they could blow him away, by hitting him in the more lightly armored areas, from behind.But even the 88 was just another target to the P-47: When it was used as an anti-aircraft gun, the pilot could see the flak coming, all the way up from the ground, and side-slip it. Then, all he had to do was train his .50 cal tracers down to the source, and voila! No more flak gun.That's eight .50 cal. machine guns, all firing at the same time, each loaded with 500 rounds of high explosive, armor-piercing ammunition, which just absolutely shredded virtually any target into confetti. And that's in addition to the single 1,000 lb. or two 500 lb. bombs they carried. They may not have been able to penetrate the turret or the hull armor of the biggest German tanks, but they definitely did penetrate the deck plates, exploding the engine and scrambling the suspension, leaving it an immovable, burning hulk. Or, if he wanted to waste a bomb, he could instantly liquidate that tank.The opposition scattered like rats when they saw a P-47 in the air - like rabbits spotting a hawk circling above.Our 90mm gun came very late in the war, but this was something we should have had from the very beginning, both as an anti-tank gun, and as the main weapon on our tanks.When Germany's Panther and Tiger tanks came into play later in the war, they were too heavily armored, and their guns too powerful for our M10 tank destroyer, which used the 3" (76mm) gun.Much later in the war, we did convert the M10 to an M36, by adding the 90mm gun, but this was along towards the end of the war, when the outcome was virtually a sure thing.The Brits offered to mount their 17 pounder, which was just about equal to the German 88, in our tanks, which they had done for their own forces. (This meant putting their gun and mount into the M4s we had given them on lend-lease, which they named the "Firefly.")But it was too big for the M4 turret. They could only squeeze it in sideways, and by completely eliminating the recoil mechanism, which meant that the entire tank absorbed the shock when it was fired, which almost killed the occupants inside when they fired it.This was obviously not the solution, but they were interested enough that they sought out different modifications to the gun to make it work.The need for a gun which could match, or even exceed, the 88, was strong enough that the British undertook extensive modifications to the 17 pounder to make it fit into the Sherman, and they finally succeeded.It is completely understandable as to why Patton wasn't in favor of that, as far as converting American M4s. It would have meant totally changing the turret, as well as the gun, on all our tanks, and having to convert to completely different ammunition.This would have created an impossible situation, since the inside of the turret has to be designed, from the get-go, to secure and store the ammunition.Plus, they didn't even have enough guns to supply their own tanks, having enough to convert only about one out of four, so how could they have supplied our vast inventory of tanks?The Tigers and Panthers only comprised about 30% of the German tanks we faced, and the M4 had no problem dispatching the remaining 70%. Given the massive effort - plus the time that would have been required - to change over, even if enough guns had been available - was deemed to be not worth it.Being in the middle of a war is hardly the time to undertake massive changes in your working inventory of battle tools.Secondly, you don't change horses in mid-stream, and Patton was doing very well, thank you very much, in knocking off Germany's tank forces just the way he was going.In the few instances of a Tiger/Sherman duel, the Tiger always won, and the myth persisted that we were completely outgunned, and that the M4 was a death trap. That was true in that particular instance, but much more often, the M4 was able to hold its own, and the skill of the crew was a bigger factor than the thickness of the armor.Actually, although much was made of the M4 being inferior to the later German tanks like the Panther and Tiger, more enemy tanks were knocked out by artillery, Tank Destroyers, fighter-bombers and Bazookas, than by M4 tank confrontations.Maybe the M4 fared second best to a Panther or Tiger tank, but so what? No matter how you killed it, a dead Panther or Tiger was pretty much harmless. And we did find ways to kill them, without sacrificing an M4 to the 88, which was a guaranteed death sentence.The way General Patton used his armor, he charged into the enemy lines and wreaked havoc in the rear areas, where they least expected him to show up, and was more into destroying troops and just general military targets behind the lines, then he was in shootouts with other German tanks.All things considered, the TDs acquitted themselves fantastically well, in that they killed many more Nazi tanks than they lost themselves.And by a wide ratio - depending on the details of where and when the unit served. But they didn't just hold their own - they prevailed, big-time! In some cases, it was a 10-to-1 ratio, but it generally averaged out to at least 5-to-1.They were fabulously successful, and all the more wonder why it has taken this long for the general public to become aware of how well they handled a job that nobody thought could be done - that of neutralizing Hitler's killer tanks!Our tanks, and George Patton himself, were viciously criticized, as if it was our fault that Hitler was so enthralled with tanks that he ordered bigger and bigger versions of them, which ultimately overpowered our M4.But what were we to do? There we were, with thousands of tanks, which we had just transported over 3000+ miles of water, and suddenly we needed more firepower to get the job done.But that was only technically, when compared with the relatively small number of Panthers and Tigers we faced. The vast majority of Nazi tanks could be handled easily by the 75mm gun of the M4.In fact, the HE (High Explosive) round of the 75mm gun was more effective than the HE round of the TDs, even though the AT (anti-tank, or armor-piercing) round of the 76mm on the TDs was much better against armor than the 75mm AP round of the M4s.So each one had some good features, which were perhaps offset by some less than terrific features of the other.The M4 was a great tank, and held its own with most of the Nazi tanks: Let the TDs take care of the rest.Well, Patton did just what he had to do: He made do with what he had, and did it quite handsomely, too, until we were able to catch up and supplement our tanks with a little more beef, in the form of the M10 and M18 and M36 Tank Destroyers, which proceeded to do a number on every German panzer they faced.Few people had any idea that the TDs were so devastating, or for that matter, any knowledge about them at all, inasmuch as until this book, very little has been known about them.But they certainly were devastating, and deadly, and only as we started to produce bigger and more powerfully armed tanks, did the realization that the TDs would ultimately become obsolete, or no longer necessary, become apparent.What is simply mind-boggling, when you think about it, is the artillery. A 155mm howitzer, self-propelled, on a chassis just like the M4, when a few of them were unleashed on any target - tanks, or whatever, and they could get the correct elevation and distance information, and start to unload with round after round, all the Nazis could do was sit there and take it. And die. There was no return fire, because they were far out of range, perhaps miles away. But they could wipe out a whole company of tanks with a few well-placed volleys of HE shells, and it's all over.They didn't need to meet up with the Germans face-to-face; all they needed was a map coordinate, of their approximate location, and they could saturate the area with high-explosive shells, and it's Goodbye, Fritz!We finally started to get some M26 Heavy Tanks with the 90mm gun, which was more than a match for the German 88, although they got there too late to have much impact. But the future had arrived, and the TDs were no longer required.After the war, the general consensus was that the TDs had served their purpose and filled the gap, but were not necessary in the future scheme of things. We had learned our lesson, and realized that we needed to build tanks that were fast, but heavily armored, and with vastly improved firepower, which the new wave of tanks provided.And so the Tank Destroyer units were demobilized, and the notion of TDs was retired forever.However, that's not to minimize, at all, the magnificent things they accomplished. It was just a case of plugging the gap with a hastily put-together program, in hit-and-miss fashion (as witness the eventual realization that the towed guns just didn't cut the mustard, and the self-propelled TDs were the answer) and finally coming up with the right combination, which completely surprised and baffled the Nazis, who were convinced of the superiority (and ultimate success) of their mighty Panzer force, which we proceeded to whittle down to virtually nothing, by the end of the war, on a one-by-one basis.
Highly recommended as a former armor and cavalry officer. This is a keeper. As has been the case US Army doctrine was wrong through most of WW2 with tank destroyer units. They worked only because crews innovated and improved their tactics despite often have antitank guns and light armor in engagements. Contrary to doctrine, they were employed as tank battalions on some occasions because they were available. The US Army made bad and deadly decisions for tank destroyer and tank battalions not to introduce 90mm gun equipped vehicles. The M36 tank destroyer beat the M26 heavy tank (now considered a medium tank) with the vastly superior 90mm gun. It should have been in units before D-Day but wasn't because of military decisions in the US. That resulted in the needless death of many armor crews. The older tank destroyers like the M10 soldiered on until the end of the war. The crews developed tactics and methods never conceived at Camp Hood (Fort Hood, Texas) in Europe. The units were eliminated after WW2 and tank destroyers were given to friendly nations.The modern equivalent is the M551 Sheridan, a vehicle I know well. It was fast and capable but often cavalry units were too gung ho for their own good (me). The light weight was a plus in Vietnam but its light armor was always a problem with RPGs. The M551 like the tank destroyer units are gone.This book is one armor folks will enjoy.
A mix of inspirational (Grunts), yet infuriating ("Leadership") detail of Tank Destroyers and "The U.S. Army" of WWII. Another example to suggest that if the Military Pyramid of structure had been lopped off at about the Company, or at least the Battalion level we would have won The War sooner - and w/ less "Friendly Fire" casualties. Over the top opinion? Yah, maybe so. But when you see the almost incomprehensibly bad "Leadership" of The U.S. Army as we entered the North Africa and Southern Europe "Theaters", you might agree more than disagree.Maybe best summarized in the opening quote of Chapter 8: "It was the doughboy, the tanker, and the TD who cracked 'The Line', and broke through the vaunted defense system."
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide PDF
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide EPub
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide Doc
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide iBooks
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide rtf
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide Mobipocket
Tank Killers: A History of America's World War II Tank Destroyer Force, by Harry Yeide Kindle